Aug 18, 2025
10-15 mins
The Top 5 Concerns of the GENIUS Act (And How Your Infrastructure Choice Can Mitigate Them)
The GENIUS Act was signed into law by President Trump on July 18 and is the United States’ first major piece of crypto legislation. While it brings much-needed clarity to the stablecoin ecosystem, it also introduces new risks, pressures, and opportunities for the infrastructure that underpins it. From reserve mandates to geopolitical friction, these are the top five concerns and how the infrastructure you choose could be your best defense.
The Stability Dilemma: 1:1 Reserves Could Stress Treasury Markets
One of the core provisions of the GENIUS Act is that stablecoin issuers must hold reserves on a 1:1 basis, typically in low-risk, highly liquid assets like U.S. Treasuries. On paper, this promotes trust and accountability. In practice, it could inject volatility into one of the world’s most systemically important financial instruments.
“If panicked customers force [stablecoin issuers] to sell [treasuries backing stablecoins], Treasury prices could collapse, sharply increasing interest rates and destabilizing other financial markets.”
— Barry Eichengreen, UC Berkeley
This isn't just theoretical. If stablecoins grow to represent hundreds of billions in total circulation, which is likely, that’s a massive influx of demand into short-term Treasuries. But here’s the real concern: in a crisis or market panic, stablecoin issuers may be forced to rapidly liquidate these assets to meet redemptions. That kind of sell-off could cause a sharp price drop in Treasuries, spiking interest rates and triggering broader financial instability.
This "liquidity mismatch" between real-time crypto redemptions and slower-moving Treasury markets mirrors what we saw in the 2020 Treasury market turmoil, when even the most liquid assets became hard to sell. The GENIUS Act could unintentionally recreate that kind of stress, but through a new, digital vector.
Why This Matters for Infrastructure
Any infrastructure provider supporting stablecoin issuance, especially in custody, exchange, clearing, or high-frequency trading environments, must build for volatility and scale. In a liquidity crisis, infrastructure becomes the bottleneck: overwhelmed APIs, delayed confirmations, and broken settlement processes aren't just bad UX, they’re existential threats to the business.
During a redemption rush, infrastructure load increases dramatically:
Wallets and custody services face surging withdrawal requests
Exchanges need to maintain uptime amid trading spikes
Transaction volumes skyrocket, stressing database and message queue systems
Real-time risk engines must react instantly to pricing and liquidity changes
How Your Infrastructure Choice Mitigates This
Choosing a resilient, redundant, and latency-optimized environment is no longer a luxury; it’s the cost of entry. Here's what that looks like in practice:
Multi-region colocation: Deploy infrastructure across diverse geographies to protect against regional outages and latency spikes.
Direct cloud on-ramps: Ensure real-time data syncing and scalable compute power during demand surges.
Geo-redundant architecture: Design systems to failover gracefully when one region becomes overloaded.
High-throughput networking: Use dedicated wavelengths or dark fiber to ensure consistent, low-latency packet delivery between systems.
Ultimately, your infrastructure is your risk posture. Building with stability in mind won’t just protect you from disruption; it may become your biggest differentiator in an increasingly regulated digital finance environment.
Federal-Only Issuers: The Rise of Regulated Gatekeepers
One of the most transformative elements of the GENIUS Act is its tight restriction on who can issue stablecoins. Under the law, Under the law, only federally approved institutions may issue stablecoins, such as banks, credit unions, and a narrow set of licensed nonbank financial entities.
In effect, this significantly restricts the era of startup-led innovation in stablecoin issuance. Gone are the days when a lean crypto-native team could spin up a token and scale it to billions in circulation. Going forward, stablecoin issuance becomes the exclusive domain of entities with deep regulatory relationships and large compliance teams.
This isn’t just about licensing, it’s about control. The Act shifts stablecoin issuance from a permissionless model to a gatekept financial infrastructure, consolidating influence among federally regulated incumbents. While that may bring added trust and oversight, it also introduces friction and raises the cost of market entry by an order of magnitude.
For issuers and for the infrastructure that supports them, the game has changed.
Why This Matters for Infrastructure
Infrastructure providers will now be expected to operate at the same level of scrutiny as their federally regulated clients. That means:
Hardened security protocols to resist both external threats and internal misuse
Auditable systems that can prove compliance in real-time or on demand
Zero downtime architecture that ensures uninterrupted access to critical systems
Data sovereignty and traceability for sensitive financial information
Transparent operational procedures that align with federal standards
In other words, infrastructure is no longer just about performance or price, it’s about compliance credibility.
This shift is especially critical for cloud providers, colocation facilities, middleware platforms, and fintech integrators. If you serve a Fed-approved issuer, your stack becomes part of their risk and compliance framework. That puts your infrastructure under the microscope of auditors, regulators, and legal teams, a level of scrutiny many providers simply aren't prepared for.
How Your Infrastructure Choice Mitigates This
To meet these higher expectations without rebuilding from scratch, providers should look for infrastructure partners that are already certified and audit-ready. At minimum, this means:
SOC 2 Type II: Ensures strong data handling, process integrity, and access controls
ISO 27001: Demonstrates global best practices in information security management
FedRAMP or equivalent frameworks: Required for handling federal workloads or partnering with federally regulated institutions
Role-based access and logging: Essential for internal accountability and external audit readiness
Real-time monitoring and incident response: To meet operational transparency requirements
Choosing infrastructure partners with these credentials isn’t just smart, it’s strategic. It means you can accelerate go-to-market, shorten audit timelines, and reduce regulatory risk while focusing on product, not paperwork.
Global Pushback: Dollarization and the Infrastructure Arms Race
The GENIUS Act doesn’t just reshape U.S. markets; it sends shockwaves across the globe. As the U.S. codifies its regulatory approach to stablecoins, other jurisdictions are scrambling to defend their monetary sovereignty.
The EU has proposed its own MiCA-compliant stablecoin framework. Hong Kong is pushing ahead with regionally regulated tokenized deposits. And in China, the push to accelerate the digital yuan (e-CNY) is gaining urgency, seen as a direct counter to the spread of U.S.-backed stablecoins.
“Pursuing dollarization could bring many adverse side effects.”
— Zhou Xiaochuan, former Governor of the People’s Bank of China
At the heart of the backlash is a geopolitical concern: that U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins represent a form of digital colonization, raising monetary sovereignty concerns, exporting American monetary policy and control into foreign markets without permission.
As these regimes erect regulatory firewalls around their domestic markets, the global crypto infrastructure stack is being forced to fragment. No longer can firms build once and deploy everywhere. Infrastructure must adapt to geopolitical boundaries, regulatory divergence, and currency-specific compliance regimes, a complex balancing act that will define winners and losers in the next wave of fintech.
Why This Matters for Infrastructure
Cross-border infrastructure providers, especially those serving wallets, exchanges, and payment rails, are now navigating a digital arms race. Your infrastructure must answer to multiple governments, each with its own rules, latency expectations, and sovereignty concerns.
Some examples of this complexity include:
Data localization requirements: Nations like India and China increasingly require that sensitive financial data be stored and processed domestically.
Licensing asymmetries: What’s legal in Singapore may be illegal in the EU, or require a completely different compliance approach.
Latency-driven competition: Traders in Hong Kong won’t tolerate milliseconds of lag to a U.S.-based exchange if a local, compliant option is faster.
Sanctions and regulatory fragmentation: Infrastructure built for U.S. compliance may be restricted, blacklisted, or deprioritized in rival jurisdictions.
Operating globally in this landscape requires flexibility, neutrality, and speed, not just technical uptime, but geopolitical uptime.
How Your Infrastructure Choice Mitigates This
The right infrastructure strategy allows you to move fluidly between regions, scale securely, and stay compliant on both sides of the regulatory divide. That means:
Deploying in politically neutral or crypto-forward jurisdictions: Locations like Switzerland, Singapore, UAE, and the Nordics offer strong data protections, clear crypto guidance, and international trust.
Using colocation facilities with low-latency global reach: Ensure your stack is within milliseconds of major regional hubs, so performance isn't sacrificed for compliance.
Building with jurisdictional modularity: Architect infrastructure so that compliance modules (KYC, transaction logging, data storage) can be tailored per region without rebuilding the entire stack.
Partnering with local infrastructure experts: To maintain uptime and insight in emerging markets, lean on local colocation providers and sovereign-compliant cloud players.
In a world where finance, policy, and infrastructure are colliding, proximity equals power. Whether you're routing trades in Singapore or settling cross-border payments from Dubai to New York, the ability to operate across borders without crossing red lines will define your long-term viability.
Compliance Overload: AML, CFT, and Auditable Infrastructure
The GENIUS Act doesn’t just define who can issue stablecoins; it defines how they must operate. At the core of the Act is a sweeping mandate: all issuers must comply with the Bank Secrecy Act and AML/CFT rules.
This isn’t surface-level compliance. The law calls for aggressive real-time monitoring, detailed customer due diligence, and the ability to generate forensic audit trails on demand. Stablecoin issuers now carry the same obligations as traditional financial institutions without the decades of legacy infrastructure built to support them.
For providers supporting these issuers including custody platforms, blockchain analytics firms, cloud partners, and middleware stacks, this translates into a new operational baseline: everything must be tracked, logged, and provable.
This marks a turning point in digital finance: the infrastructure stack is now a compliance instrument.
Why This Matters for Infrastructure
Monitoring for suspicious activity doesn’t start at the app layer. It starts at the infrastructure level, where decisions about data flows, storage, access control, and auditability are made.
Issuers and their partners must be able to:
Log every transaction, access request, and API call with precise timestamps
Store data immutably and in line with jurisdictional retention laws
Segment sensitive data using role-based access and encryption
Generate auditable reports in real time for regulators, law enforcement, and internal compliance teams
Trigger alerts and response actions when anomalous activity is detected at the infrastructure level, not just in the UI
And this isn’t optional. Regulators expect immediate and comprehensive visibility into how, when, and by whom stablecoins are issued, transferred, or redeemed.
If your infrastructure can’t provide this, your customers may not be able to operate at all.
How Your Infrastructure Choice Mitigates This
Building audit-grade systems from scratch is costly and slow. That’s why choosing infrastructure partners with built-in compliance tooling is critical to staying competitive in a regulated market.
Here’s what to look for:
Granular logging: Every event (logins, API calls, data access, changes) should be logged in real time, stored securely, and easily searchable
Robust access controls: Support for multi-factor authentication, role-based access, just-in-time provisioning, and full visibility into who has access to what and when
Immutable storage with versioning: Logs and sensitive data should be tamper-evident and support historical playback for compliance review
Integrated alerting and SIEM compatibility: Real-time integration with security incident and event management tools (SIEM) makes forensic investigation faster and easier
Fast forensic response: Infrastructure should support rapid isolation of suspicious activity, rollback capabilities, and detailed reporting for any incident or anomaly
These features aren’t just about avoiding fines; they’re about earning trust. In a world where regulators are watching and illicit actors are constantly testing boundaries, infrastructure that enables compliance becomes a competitive advantage.
By choosing auditable, security-forward infrastructure, stablecoin issuers and their partners can operate confidently knowing they’re not just compliant, but compliance-ready at every layer.
Opportunity vs. Speed: Regulatory Clarity May Outpace Readiness
Here’s the paradox: the GENIUS Act is a watershed moment for digital assets. It delivers long-awaited regulatory clarity the kind that institutional investors, banks, and enterprises need before deploying real capital into stablecoin systems and blockchain infrastructure.
But here’s the problem: clarity isn’t the same as readiness.
While the regulatory landscape may now be mapped, most infrastructure players are still figuring out how to navigate it at speed. Providers that once thrived in crypto’s regulatory gray zones now face the challenge of building to spec with compliance, uptime, auditability, and multi-jurisdiction support baked in from day one.
This creates a massive opportunity for prepared providers, and a ticking clock for everyone else.
The GENIUS Act will accelerate demand for compliant, scalable infrastructure not next year, but now. Those who wait for perfect playbooks will be left behind by those already operating at regulation-grade.
Why This Matters for Infrastructure
Many infrastructure providers, especially data centers, cloud platforms, and connectivity partners, are still treating Web3 as an edge case or side business. But with the GENIUS Act, stablecoins are no longer niche. They are now federally regulated digital dollars with real-world value, velocity, and risk.
This means:
Infrastructure must support mission-critical workloads, not just experimental apps
Providers must understand crypto-native use cases, from validator nodes to hot/cold wallet separation
Legal and compliance teams must be prepared to engage with regulators, not just startups
SLAs, uptime guarantees, and security policies must meet financial-grade expectations
Simply put: there’s a difference between being crypto-friendly and being crypto-capable. The latter requires depth and providers who aren’t already there will struggle to catch up.
How Your Infrastructure Choice Mitigates This
The smartest move you can make is to align with partners who are already building for this world, not reacting to it. That means choosing infrastructure that’s:
Battle-tested in Web3 environments: Look for providers already serving blockchains, exchanges, or fintech applications
Deeply integrated across the stack: The best partners have relationships not just in facilities and cloud, but also in legal, banking, and digital asset custody
Forward-thinking and adaptable: Whether it’s modular compliance frameworks, region-specific deployments, or hybrid cloud setups, your infrastructure should move as fast as regulation does
Educated on the new risks: Providers should understand things like smart contract exposure, MEV risks, wallet key management, and blockchain-specific threat vectors
Working with providers that anticipate regulation, rather than scramble to react to it, will allow you to focus on product, scale, and differentiation, not compliance catch-up.
You don’t need to guess what’s next. You need partners who are already building for it.
The GENIUS Act isn’t just a turning point for stablecoins; it’s a full-blown inflection point for digital finance infrastructure.
It introduces long-awaited regulatory clarity, but with it comes a wave of new responsibilities, risks, and requirements for the infrastructure providers who support this ecosystem. From U.S. Treasury exposure and centralized issuer gatekeeping to global political friction and AML enforcement, the landscape is changing fast, and not everyone is ready.
The pressure is real:
Markets are volatile
Regulators are watching
Investors are moving faster than ever
And now, five concerns stand out as critical for anyone building, buying, or relying on digital infrastructure under the GENIUS Act:
The Stability Dilemma – Reserve requirements could stress U.S. Treasury markets.
Federal-Only Issuers – Rower concentrates in the hands of regulated gatekeepers.
Global Pushback – Geopolitical resistance could ignite an infrastructure arms race.
Compliance Overload – AML, CFT, and audit requirements demand new levels of transparency.
Opportunity vs. Speed – Regulatory clarity may outpace industry readiness.
In this new era, your infrastructure isn’t just about speed, price, or scale; it’s about resilience, auditability, and trust.
Key Takeaway
If you're supporting stablecoin issuers or planning to, your infrastructure choices will define your risk posture, regulatory readiness, and market credibility.
The providers who treat compliance as a feature (not a flaw), who design for jurisdictional flexibility, and who operate with financial-grade uptime and transparency those are the ones who will lead the next wave of adoption.
Final Thought
The rules are changing. The question is: are you building with them or behind them?
About the Author
Chanyu Kuo
Director of Marketing at Inflect
Chanyu is a creative and data-driven marketing leader with over 10 years of experience, especially in the tech and cloud industry, helping businesses establish strong digital presence, drive growth, and stand out from the competition. Chanyu holds an MS in Marketing from the University of Strathclyde and specializes in effective content marketing, lead generation, and strategic digital growth in the digital infrastructure space.
Contact: